Save the two-tier Lyme disease test

The western blot based two-tier test (TTT) is not that sensitive of a test. Only 25% of patients with early Lyme disease had a positive western blot TTT, according to a study published in the March 2017 issue of Clinical Infectious Diseases. And, only 55% of the early Lyme disease study participants had a positive western blot TTT on convalescence. [1]

 

by Daniel J. Cameron, MD MPH

However, the western blot TTT has allowed doctors serologic confirmation for some early Lyme disease cases. The test requires that positive or equivocal ELISA tests be confirmed with 2 of 3 IgM bands or 5 of 10 IgG bands. The western blot based TTT has been considered sensitive for chronic manifestations by some doctors [2] but not others. [3]

Given its lack of sensitivity, researchers have proposed utilizing a combination of several other serologic tests. The study’s authors evaluated a combination of a whole-cell sonicate (WCS) EIA, a C6 EIA, and/or a VlsE chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA). [1]

The sensitivity of these proposed protocols was not much better, however, than the western blot TTT test, which had sensitivity ranging from 36% to 54% for early Lyme disease. [1] The sensitivity of the proposed modified 2-tier testing (MTTT) protocols ranged from 66% to 72% on convalescence. [1]

Branda and colleagues, from the Departments of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, suggest eliminating the western blot based TTT in favor of a modified 2-tier testing.

“Although there were minor differences in sensitivity and specificity among MTTT protocols, each provides comparable or greater sensitivity in acute EM, and similar specificity compared with conventional 2-tiered testing, obviating the need for Western blots,” argues Branda. [1]

Any recommendation to eliminate the western blot TTT in favor of a combination of a (WCS) EIA, C6 EIA, and VlsE (CLIA) test is inarguably premature. A sensitivity of 36% to 54% for early Lyme disease and 66% to 72% for convalescent Lyme disease is still low.

Moreover, the sensitivity of a combination of a (WCS) EIA, C6 EIA, and/or VlsE (CLIA) was based on only 55 erythema migrans patients. Finally, the sensitivity of a combination of a (WCS) EIA, C6 EIA, and/or VlsE (CLIA) for chronic manifestations of Lyme disease has not been determined.

For now, it would be reasonable to save the western blot TTT. Since its adoption in 1994, it has provided serologic confirmation for some Lyme disease patients.

References:

  1. Branda JA, Strle K, Nigrovic LE et al. Evaluation of Modified 2-Tiered Serodiagnostic Testing Algorithms for Early Lyme Disease. Clin Infect Dis, (2017).
  2. Wormser GP, Dattwyler RJ, Shapiro ED et al. The clinical assessment, treatment, and prevention of lyme disease, human granulocytic anaplasmosis, and babesiosis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis, 43(9), 1089-1134 (2006).
  3. Cameron DJ, Johnson LB, Maloney EL. Evidence assessments and guideline recommendations in Lyme disease: the clinical management of known tick bites, erythema migrans rashes and persistent disease. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther, 1-33 (2014).

 


2 Replies to "Save the two-tier Lyme disease test"

  • Jennifer
    04/28/2017 (12:20 pm)
    Reply

    I want to know….why can a tick be tested without problems, as where a human test is little better than 50%. In my case I had been tested 5-6 times over a span of 18 yrs. Never came back positive until my immune system shut down. I was bitten as a child at some point. Started getting symptoms of swollen muscles/joints at age 19. Finally had a positive test when I was 37. It’s insane to me that more studies aren’t done to better diagnose this disease.

    • Dr. Daniel Cameron
      04/29/2017 (11:12 am)
      Reply

      The tick studies tests typically involve PCR or antigen tests. These tests are a problem in the body with the complexity of the DNA and proteins in the body. The two-tier depends on the human immune response.


Got something to say?

Some html is OK