{"id":33151,"date":"2017-07-24T21:03:51","date_gmt":"2017-07-25T02:03:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/danielcameronmd.com\/babesia-cases-skyrocket-wisconsin-26-fold-increase\/"},"modified":"2025-01-13T21:13:53","modified_gmt":"2025-01-14T03:13:53","slug":"babesia-cases-skyrocket-wisconsin-26-fold-increase","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/danielcameronmd.com\/babesia-cases-skyrocket-wisconsin-26-fold-increase\/","title":{"rendered":"Babesia cases skyrocket in Wisconsin with a 26-fold increase"},"content":{"rendered":"
In Wisconsin, between 2001 and 2015, \u201cthere was a 26-fold increase in the incidence of confirmed babesiosis<\/em>, in addition to geographic expansion,\u201d according to MMWR<\/span>.<\/a><\/span> [1] The report listed suburbanization, forest fragmentation patterns, and warming average temperatures as potential causes behind the surge.<\/p>\n The rising prevalence of co-infections in rodents may also be to blame for the rise in Babesia<\/em> cases. When studying the Northeastern region, Diuk-Wasser from Columbia University<\/span> <\/a><\/span>in New York City found \u201cthe prevalence of co-infection tends to be greater in rodents, ranging from 6% to 41%, because they are exposed to multiple tick bites during their lifetime.\u201d [2] Furthermore, she adds, \u201cthe prevalence of B. burgdorferi<\/em> and B. microti<\/em> co-infection ranges from 0% to 13% in nymphs and from 2% to 13% in adults.\u201d<\/p>\n Babesia<\/em> can be severe, causing life-threatening symptoms. According to the report, in Wisconsin between 2001 and 2015, \u201cthree deaths occurred, one in a woman aged 88 years, and two in men aged 64 and 72 years.\u201d [1] Most cases, however, are treated without hospitalization. Thirty-five percent of the confirmed Babesia<\/em> cases, and 76% of the probable cases were treated in the community.<\/p>\n Of the confirmed cases:<\/span> Individuals contracting Babesia<\/em> through blood transfusions has also been reported. \u201cThree confirmed cases of transfusion-associated transmission were detected in 2008 and one in 2011, before implementation of routine screening for babesiosis<\/em> by Wisconsin blood banks in 2016,\u201d according to MMWR. [1]<\/p>\n [bctt tweet=”Babesia cases skyrocket in Wisconsin. ” username=”DrDanielCameron”]<\/p>\n The authors point out that perinatal transmission of Babesia<\/em> has been reported, as well. Transplacental transmission is not described in the MMWR Wisconsin report, but was discussed in a 2017 review of tick-borne diseases in the Cleveland Clinic of North America.<\/span> <\/a><\/span>[3]<\/p>\n Babesia cases spread throughout Wisconsin<\/strong><\/p>\n During 2001 \u2013 2005, 20 counties in Wisconsin (28% of the state) reported at least one confirmed case of Babesia<\/em>. That number rose to 30 counties between 2006 and 2010. And during 2011 \u2013 2015, the number of counties reporting at least one case had jumped to 40.<\/p>\n The actual number of Babesia<\/em> cases in Wisconsin is unknown. To be considered a confirmed case, the MMWR required a blood smear or a 4-fold increase or greater in B. microti<\/em> immunoglobulin G [IgG] antibody titers. [1] However, the blood smear has poor sensitivity, the authors point out. \u201cBlood smear exam has a substantially lower sensitivity of detection of parasites (100\u2013500 parasites\/\u03bcL blood) than does PCR which can be positive at concentrations as low as one to three parasites per \u03bcL of blood.\u201d<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Related posts:<\/strong><\/p>\n Study raises concerns for Babesia patients and blood banks<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n Babesia becomes the number 2 tick-borne illness behind Lyme disease in the Hudson Valley\u00a0<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n
\n\u2022 64% = male
\n\u2022 68% = over age 60
\n\u2022 96% = onset of illness occurred between April and October<\/p>\n