Pediatric Lyme Disease: Why Standard Approaches Often Miss It

This article examines why Lyme disease in children is frequently misdiagnosed—and how pediatric presentations differ from adult infection.

When Academic Success Disappears Overnight

Maya had never struggled in school. At 13, she was in advanced classes, played violin in the school orchestra, and maintained a close circle of friends. Two weeks after a family camping trip in upstate New York, everything changed.

First came the headaches—dull at first, then severe enough to send her home from school. Then she started forgetting homework assignments she’d written down hours earlier. Within a month, she was crying over math problems she used to finish easily, snapping at her parents without provocation, and complaining that her knees hurt when she walked upstairs.

Her pediatrician examined her thoroughly. Blood work came back normal. Physical exam was unremarkable. “Probably just stress,” the doctor suggested. “Maybe she’s anxious about high school next year.”

A therapist was consulted. After three sessions, she mentioned the possibility of ADHD—something that had never been an issue before. The school counselor recommended accommodations for anxiety.

Maya’s mother kept a detailed journal documenting the changes. She noticed something the specialists hadn’t connected: the timing. Every symptom—the headaches, the cognitive difficulties, the mood changes, the joint pain—started within two weeks of that camping trip.

She reviewed photos from the trip and found one showing a faint circular rash on Maya’s back. It had faded within days, and Maya hadn’t mentioned it.

When she brought this pattern to a clinician familiar with tick-borne illness, Lyme testing was ordered. Initial two-tier serology came back negative. But clinical evaluation—considering the rash, the timeline, and the constellation of symptoms—led to a diagnosis of neurologic Lyme disease. Treatment began.

Six months later, Maya was back in advanced classes, performing in concerts, and functioning at her baseline. But her mother still wonders: what if she hadn’t kept that journal? What if she’d accepted the anxiety diagnosis and stopped looking?

This pattern is not unusual. Pediatric Lyme disease frequently presents as behavioral or academic decline—and standard diagnostic approaches often miss it entirely.

How Pediatric Lyme Disease Differs from Adult Infection

Lyme disease in children often follows a different trajectory than in adults. While adults may experience gradual onset of fatigue, joint pain, and neurologic symptoms, children’s presentations can be more abrupt and dramatic.

Behavioral and cognitive changes are often more prominent in pediatric cases than in adults. A previously well-adjusted child may develop sudden anxiety, obsessive behaviors, or academic difficulties. These changes are frequently attributed to developmental phases, stress, or emerging psychiatric conditions—delaying recognition of an infectious cause.

Joint pain in children is commonly dismissed as “growing pains” or sports-related injuries, particularly when it comes and goes. The migratory nature of Lyme arthritis—affecting different joints at different times—can make the pattern harder to recognize.

Fatigue in children is often reframed as behavioral. Parents may be told their child simply needs better sleep hygiene, less screen time, or more structure. The profound, unrefreshing exhaustion characteristic of tick-borne illness is mistaken for laziness or poor habits.

Perhaps most challenging: symptoms in pediatric Lyme disease often fluctuate. A child may appear completely well one week and profoundly symptomatic the next. This inconsistency can make it difficult for parents to convince clinicians that something serious is occurring.

Children’s developing immune systems may also respond differently to infection, producing symptom patterns that don’t match adult presentations documented in medical literature.

Why Standard Diagnostic Approaches Fail in Children

The same barriers that delay adult Lyme diagnosis are amplified in pediatric cases.

Testing Limitations Are More Pronounced

Serologic testing for Lyme disease—already imperfect in adults—may be even less sensitive in children. Antibody responses can be slower or weaker in developing immune systems. The two-tier testing algorithm was validated primarily on adult populations, and its performance in early pediatric infection is less well characterized.

False negatives are common when testing occurs in the first weeks after infection, precisely when early treatment would be most beneficial. Yet negative results are often treated as definitive, ending clinical inquiry even when symptoms persist.

When diagnosis relies heavily on laboratory confirmation rather than clinical assessment, pediatric cases are more likely to be missed.

Symptoms Are Systematically Misattributed

The overlap between Lyme disease manifestations and common childhood diagnoses creates predictable patterns of misattribution:

Academic struggles are referred for ADHD evaluation rather than infectious disease assessment. Anxiety and mood changes trigger psychiatric referrals. Joint pain is dismissed as growing pains. Fatigue is attributed to behavioral issues or poor sleep habits.

Each specialist sees one piece of the puzzle. Psychiatry addresses the anxiety. Rheumatology evaluates the joint pain. Neurology considers headaches. No one steps back to ask whether a single infectious process might explain the entire pattern.

This fragmentation is a feature of the system—not a failure of individual clinicians—but the impact on pediatric patients is significant.

Tick Exposure Is Harder to Document

Children play outdoors more frequently than adults and are less likely to notice or report tick bites. Parents may be unaware of exposure. Rashes on the scalp, back, or other hidden areas go unseen. Brief outdoor activities—a picnic, a hike, time in a backyard—are dismissed as “low risk” even in endemic regions.

Without documented tick exposure, Lyme disease may not enter the differential diagnosis at all.

System Barriers Hit Families Harder

Time constraints in pediatric primary care leave little room for evaluating complex, multisystem illness. Referrals to specialists fragment care rather than integrating it. Insurance restrictions limit access to clinicians experienced with tick-borne disease. Geographic bias leads providers in “non-endemic” areas to dismiss Lyme even when families report recent travel or relocation.

When multiple barriers align—absent rash, negative serology, nonspecific symptoms, unrecalled tick bite—pediatric Lyme disease can remain undiagnosed for months or years.

PANS and Neuropsychiatric Manifestations

Some children with tick-borne illness develop acute-onset neuropsychiatric symptoms that can be particularly striking and confusing.

PANS—Pediatric Acute-onset Neuropsychiatric Syndrome—describes sudden behavioral and cognitive changes including obsessive-compulsive behaviors, anxiety, emotional lability, tics, and sensory sensitivities. When triggered by streptococcal infection, the syndrome is called PANDAS (Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated with Streptococcal Infections).

Evidence suggests that other infections, including Lyme disease and co-infections, may trigger similar immune-mediated neuropsychiatric symptoms. The mechanism is thought to involve immune activation affecting the basal ganglia and other brain structures involved in behavior regulation.

In my practice, children presenting with sudden-onset OCD symptoms, rage episodes, or severe separation anxiety following tick exposure often show improvement with appropriate treatment for tick-borne illness—suggesting infectious or immune triggers rather than primary psychiatric disease.

This does not mean all PANS is Lyme disease, nor that all pediatric Lyme causes PANS. But the overlap is clinically significant. When neuropsychiatric symptoms appear abruptly in a previously well child—particularly with temporal association to potential tick exposure—evaluation for tick-borne illness should be considered alongside other causes.

Treatment approaches differ substantially. Immune-mediated PANS may respond to antimicrobial therapy, anti-inflammatory treatment, or immunomodulation, whereas primary psychiatric illness typically requires different interventions. Misdiagnosis in either direction can delay appropriate care.

Co-infections Complicate Pediatric Cases

A single tick bite can transmit multiple pathogens. Co-infections with Babesia, Bartonella, Anaplasma, or other organisms can produce symptoms that overlap with or extend beyond Lyme disease alone.

Babesia—a parasitic infection affecting red blood cells—commonly causes air hunger, night sweats, and anxiety that may be mistaken for panic disorder. Bartonella has been linked to neurologic symptoms, mood disturbances, and characteristic stretch marks that can appear suddenly. Anaplasma causes acute febrile illness that may be diagnosed as a viral syndrome and never followed up.

Children may harbor multiple infections simultaneously, each contributing to the clinical picture. Standard two-tier Lyme testing does not detect co-infections, and specific testing for these organisms is not routinely performed unless clinically suspected.

When treatment for Lyme disease alone produces incomplete response in pediatric patients, co-infections should be reconsidered. Persistent symptoms do not always indicate treatment failure—they may indicate untreated co-pathogens.

What Changes When Pediatric Lyme Disease Is Recognized Early

Early recognition fundamentally alters outcomes.

Treatment initiated before symptoms become entrenched is associated with better response rates and shorter treatment courses. Academic and social disruption can be minimized or prevented entirely. Normal childhood development proceeds without prolonged interruption.

For Maya, early treatment restored her cognitive function and allowed her to complete eighth grade without falling behind. But six months of her life—months spent confused, struggling, and misunderstood—could have been prevented with earlier recognition.

That window of time may seem brief in the context of a full childhood, but for a 13-year-old navigating critical social and academic transitions, it represents significant loss.

Early diagnosis is not a guarantee of perfect outcomes. Some children experience lingering symptoms even with prompt treatment. But it provides the best opportunity for full recovery and preservation of normal development.

The Clinical Imperative

Pediatric Lyme disease is not “adult Lyme in a smaller body.” It presents differently, progresses differently, and requires clinical vigilance that standard approaches often don’t provide.

When behavioral changes, academic decline, or unexplained symptoms appear in children—especially with temporal association to outdoor exposure—clinical suspicion should remain high even when initial testing is unrevealing.

Parents often recognize patterns before clinicians do, not because they know more medicine, but because they observe the whole child across all contexts: home, school, activities, social settings. That longitudinal perspective has clinical value and deserves partnership rather than dismissal.

The question is not whether every headache or mood change represents Lyme disease. The question is whether the possibility is considered when clinical patterns suggest it—and whether negative serology prematurely ends that inquiry.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the most common presentations of pediatric Lyme disease?
Behavioral changes, academic decline, joint pain, headaches, and profound fatigue. These often overlap with other childhood conditions, making diagnosis challenging without high clinical suspicion.

Can Lyme disease cause sudden psychiatric symptoms in children?
Yes. Some children develop acute-onset neuropsychiatric symptoms including anxiety, OCD-like behaviors, mood changes, or rage episodes—sometimes linked to PANS when immune activation affects brain function.

Are Lyme tests accurate in children?
Antibody-based tests have the same limitations in children as in adults—and may be less sensitive in early pediatric infection. Clinical diagnosis should not rely solely on serology, particularly in the first weeks after exposure.

How is pediatric Lyme disease different from adult infection?
Children often present with more prominent neurologic and behavioral symptoms, more abrupt onset, and greater overlap with developmental or psychiatric diagnoses. Symptom fluctuation is also more common.

What should I do if my child has tick exposure but no rash?
Consult a healthcare provider familiar with tick-borne illness. In endemic areas, monitor for symptoms and consider whether prophylactic treatment is appropriate depending on tick type, attachment time, and local guidelines.

Can children fully recover from Lyme disease?
Most children treated early recover completely. Delayed diagnosis may lead to more prolonged symptoms, but appropriate treatment still produces favorable outcomes in many cases.

Social Converations with Dr. Daniel Cameron

Lyme Disease

Lyme Science Blog