Risk of tick bites at outdoor events
A research group in the UK described a novel way to determine the risk of tick bites at an outside event. Researchers asked ≈500 participants in a 2-day mountain marathon in Scotland to check for ticks.  Their findings are reported in an Emerging Infectious Diseases article, “Use of Mass-Participation Outdoor Events to Assess Human Exposure to Tickborne Pathogens.”
by Daniel J. Cameron, MD MPH
The event consisted of 2 days of long distance mountain racing through a tick-infested habitat in Scotland. “Teams of 2 runners each navigate mountainous terrain, carrying all their equipment for an overnight camp,” according to Hall from the University of Salford. 
To encourage participation in the study, racers were offered a tick-removal service, Hall points out. At the end of each day, the racers were given a 1.5-mL tube containing 70% ethanol. They were asked to place any ticks found on their bodies into the tube.
Participants submitted more ticks than expected. All of the 564 ticks removed and submitted were of the species I. ricinus. On day 1 of the race, 8.5% individuals were bitten, compared with 13.8% on day 2.  The authors reported larval tick bites had been of concern with reports of B. miyamotoi infections in I. ricinus larvae. Larval tick bites were reported in 4% and 8.8% of participants on day 1 and day 2, respectively. One of the nymphs was infected with B. miyamotoi.
What diseases did the ticks carry?
The ticks were infected with bacteria typically reported in Europe. Investigators identified B. afzelii, B. burgdorferi sensu stricto, B. valaisiana, B. garinii, and B. miyamotoi.  The authors did not assess the ticks for co-infections.
Fortunately, none of the competitors contracted a tick-borne illness. The authors presumed this was due to the prophylactic removal of the tick. 
The authors demonstrated the value of relying on human participation in outdoor events, rather than dragging a cloth, to assess exposure to tick-borne pathogens. The authors cite other studies utilizing human participation in outdoor events. 
• Ticks were removed from almost 1,100 visitors to a popular woodland site in southern England during April – October 1996 and 1997. 
• 710 tick bites were recorded for 568 soldiers at an outdoor training base in Germany during April – September 2009. 
• In a Mora survey of 931 scouts attending summer camps in Belgium, 22.8 tick bites/1,000 person-days were recorded. 
The risk of a tick bite may have been higher than expected due to the competitors not always using clear footpaths and wearing shorts with short-sleeved tops. Hall and colleagues provide insight into the risk of tick bites at outdoor events in the UK. The results “may represent values encountered more widely across Scotland and other parts of the United Kingdom,” cautions Hall. 
It would be reasonable to encourage tick bite awareness at outdoor events with organizers possibly offering tick-removal services.
- Hall JL, Alpers K, Bown KJ, Martin SJ, Birtles RJ: Use of Mass-Participation Outdoor Events to Assess Human Exposure to Tickborne Pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis 2017, 23(3):463-467.
- Robertson JN, Gray JS, Stewart P: Tick bite and Lyme borreliosis risk at a recreational site in England. Eur J Epidemiol 2000, 16(7):647-652.
- Faulde MK, Rutenfranz M, Hepke J, Rogge M, Gorner A, Keth A: Human tick infestation pattern, tick-bite rate, and associated Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. infection risk during occupational tick exposure at the Seedorf military training area, northwestern Germany. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2014, 5(5):594-599.
- De Keukeleire M, Vanwambeke SO, Somasse E, Kabamba B, Luyasu V, Robert A: Scouts, forests, and ticks: Impact of landscapes on human-tick contacts. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2015, 6(5):636-644.