Lyme Literate Doctor: What Does It Really Take?
AI, Lyme Science Blog
Jun 20

Lyme Literate Doctor: What Does It Really Take?

Like
Visited 467 Times, 2 Visits today

Lyme Literate Doctor: What Does It Really Take?

So, what does it take to be a Lyme literate doctor?
The term is often used—sometimes dismissively—yet rarely defined with clinical precision.


:contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}

argues that “Lyme disease conforms to the same fundamental rules and principles applicable
to other infectious diseases.”

However, Baker does not define what it would actually take for a board-certified infectious
disease specialist to be considered “Lyme literate,” particularly when patients present
with complex, multisystem illness.

Defining a Lyme Literate Doctor

At a minimum, a Lyme literate doctor should be able to recognize, diagnose, and manage
Lyme disease across its full clinical spectrum—not just early infection or classic
presentations.

A truly Lyme literate clinician should be comfortable evaluating and treating patients
with the following conditions:

Clinical Conditions a Lyme Literate Doctor Should Recognize

  1. Lyme encephalopathy
  2. Lyme neuropathy
  3. Neuropsychiatric Lyme disease
  4. Pediatric neuropsychiatric disorders (PANS)
  5. Lyme carditis
  6. Autonomic dysfunction, including POTS
  7. Post-treatment Lyme fatigue and post-Lyme disease syndromes
  8. Neuropathic pain syndromes
  9. Persistent symptoms following Lyme disease
  10. Concurrent tick-borne co-infections

Why This Definition Matters

Many of these presentations are well documented in the medical literature, yet they are
often minimized, reframed, or excluded from routine Lyme disease evaluations.

A Lyme literate doctor does not abandon evidence-based medicine. Instead, they recognize
the limitations of current diagnostics, the variability of immune response, and the
biological plausibility of persistent or relapsing illness in a subset of patients.

Lyme literacy, therefore, is not about ideology—it is about clinical breadth, intellectual
humility, and the willingness to engage diagnostic uncertainty without prematurely
dismissing patients.

References:
  1. Baker PJ. Is It Possible to Make a Correct Diagnosis of Lyme Disease on Symptoms Alone?
    Review of Key Issues and Public Health Implications.
    Am J Med. 2019.
  2. Logigian EL, Kaplan RF, Steere AC. Chronic neurologic manifestations of Lyme disease.
    N Engl J Med. 1990;323(21):1438–1444.
  3. Fallon BA, Nields JA. Lyme disease: a neuropsychiatric illness.
    Am J Psychiatry. 1994;151(11):1571–1583.
  4. Sigra S, Hesselmark E, Bejerot S. Treatment of PANDAS and PANS: a systematic review.
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018;86:51–65.
  5. Muehlenbachs A, Bollweg BC, Schulz TJ, et al.
    Cardiac tropism of Borrelia burgdorferi.
    Am J Pathol. 2016.
  6. Kanjwal K, Karabin B, Kanjwal Y, Grubb BP.
    Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome following Lyme disease.
    Cardiol J. 2011;18(1):63–66.
  7. Krupp LB, Hyman LG, Grimson R, et al.
    Study and treatment of post Lyme disease (STOP-LD).
    Neurology. 2003;60(12):1923–1930.
  8. Simons LE.
    Fear of pain in children and adolescents with neuropathic pain.
    Pain. 2016;157(Suppl 1):S90–S97.
  9. Klempner MS, Hu LT, Evans J, et al.
    Two controlled trials of antibiotic treatment in patients with persistent symptoms.
    N Engl J Med. 2001;345(2):85–92.
  10. Krause PJ, Telford SR, Spielman A, et al.
    Concurrent Lyme disease and babesiosis.
    JAMA. 1996;275(21):1657–1660.

Link
The Case for Chronic Lyme: A Medical Perspective

Related Posts

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *