Dr. Daniel Cameron: Inside Lyme Podcast

A 46-year-old woman with Lyme disease with bilateral vision loss.

Dr. Cameron feels that the best way to get to know Lyme disease is through reviewing actual cases. In this Inside Lyme Podcast episode, he will be discussing a 46-year-old woman with Lyme disease with bilateral vision loss.

Jha and her colleague first discussed this case in the Wisconsin Medical Journal in 2018.

An ophthalmologic exam confirmed the optometrist finding of optic neuritis. Optic neuritis is an inflammation of the optic nerve. She also had am impaired color vision in both eyes,

Her vision loss was significant. Legal blindness is defined as having a visual acuity of 20/200 or worse in the better eye after correction. Her visual acuity was 20/400 in both eyes. 

“Upon questioning, she endorsed some improvement in vision after initiation of antibiotic,” write the authors.

But the final outcome was uncertain since the woman left the hospital against medical advice and did not adhere to her follow-up appointments. 

You can hear more about these cases through his blogs, social media, and YouTube. Sign up for our newsletter to keep up with these cases.

You can read the full text of this podcast at: 

https://danielcameronmd.com/lyme-disease-vision-problems/

How to Connect with Dr. Daniel Cameron:

We, of course, hope you’ll join the conversation, connect with us and other readers, ask questions, and share your insights.

 Dr. Cameron is a Lyme disease expert and the author “Inside Lyme: An expert's guide to the science of Lyme disease.” He has been treating adolescents and adults for more than 30 years.

Please remember that the advice given is general and not intended as specific advice as to any particular patient. If you require specific advice, then please seek that advice from an experienced professional.


No Replies to "A 46-year-old woman with Lyme disease with bilateral vision loss."


    Join the Lyme Conversation
    (Note: comments are moderated. You will see your comment after it has been reviewed.)

    Some html is OK