Why I Treat Babesia Even if the Tests Are Negative
Lyme Science Blog
Jun 03

Why I Treat Babesia Even if the Tests Are Negative

Comments: 2
1
Visited 1301 Times, 4 Visits today

When a Patient Asks Why I Treat Babesia Even if the Tests Are Negative, They Often Say:

“But my test was negative—why are we treating Babesia?”

It’s a fair question.

I’ll often explain that Babesia testing isn’t perfect. False negatives are common. And many patients improve when we treat for Babesia—despite negative test results.

So today, let’s break it down—in the form of a clinical dialogue.

💬 A Clinical Dialogue on Treating Babesia with Negative Tests

Cameron: One of my patients had classic Babesia symptoms—night sweats, air hunger, severe fatigue—but her test came back negative. She asked, “Are we sure I have Babesia?”

Colleague: That’s a tough spot. The tests—like PCR and blood smear—are known to miss cases, especially if the parasitemia is low.

Cameron: Exactly. And Babesia can persist in tissues, not just the bloodstream. By the time symptoms show up, the parasite may not be detectable.

Colleague: So you’re relying on clinical diagnosis?

Cameron: Yes. I look at the full picture—especially when a patient isn’t improving with Lyme-only treatment. If they have night sweats, POTS, air hunger, or unexplained drops in oxygen levels, Babesia is high on my list.

Colleague: Have you seen patients get better on Babesia treatment even without positive tests?

Cameron: Many times. Some improve dramatically with atovaquone and azithromycin. Others need more aggressive treatment. The point is—symptoms, not just test results, guide treatment.

🔬 What the Research Shows

  • Babesia PCR and smear have limited sensitivity—false negatives are common, especially in chronic cases.
  • Studies (e.g., Krause et al.) show Babesia can persist despite negative tests.
  • Babesia duncani may not be picked up by B. microti-focused tests.
  • Immunocompromised patients often test negative despite active infection.

🩺 Why Clinical Judgment Still Matters

  • Tick-borne diseases often co-occur and mask each other.
  • Tests are snapshots—symptoms are the full story.
  • Negative tests shouldn’t exclude treatment when clinical signs are strong.
  • Empiric treatment can be diagnostic and therapeutic.

What I Do in My Practice

  • I ask about hallmark Babesia symptoms: night sweats, air hunger, fatigue, autonomic issues.
  • I treat empirically when symptoms are consistent and Lyme-only treatment has failed.
  • I monitor response closely—improvement can confirm the diagnosis.
  • I adjust treatment based on clinical response, not just lab data.

🧭 Final Thoughts

Babesia is often missed—not because it’s rare, but because testing is limited.

When patients present with persistent symptoms and negative tests, I don’t dismiss them—I dig deeper.

If treatment for Lyme disease alone isn’t working, I ask: What if it’s Babesia?

A negative test shouldn’t be the end of the conversation. It should be the start of a closer look.

That’s why I treat Babesia when the symptoms fit—even if the test doesn’t.

 

Related Posts

2 thoughts on “Why I Treat Babesia Even if the Tests Are Negative”

  1. I recently have read reports of the babesia strain Odocoilei being far more common that once supposed. I have also been reading recently that this strain might be a “missing link” in patients with refractory TBDs, who when treated for this strain, have shown improvements. Questions: does this strain cause the same symptoms as other babesia strains? And, might it be wise to assume this strain is a culprit, despite lack of symptoms and despite positive testing. To my understanding it is T-Labs that is picking this up. Thank sincerely for for all you do. Mary

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *